CWP-27538-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 143 KAPIL DEO TRIPATHI STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. M. M. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Ms. Ms. Richa Tayal, Advocate for respondent no.3/HPSC. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed, quashing the announcement dated Commission, as also the order dated 05.09.2025 petitioner’s candidature has been rejected on that basis. 2. T candidates from other States as well as the Haryana State (who are co category, on their own merit) category candidates, before considering their candidature in UR/General category”. 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Decided On: KAPIL DEO TRIPATHI Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. M. M. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Ms. Harpriya Khaneka, Advocate with Ms. Richa Tayal, Advocate for respondent no.3/HPSC. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia announcement dated 26.06.2025 , as also the order dated 05.09.2025 petitioner’s candidature has been rejected on that basis. The impugned announcement requires candidates from other States as well as the R Haryana State (who are coming within the qualifying zone in UR/General category, on their own merit) has to be checked at par with the UR/General category candidates, before considering their candidature in UR/General IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27538-2025 Decided On: 15.09.2025 ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) . JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Harpriya Khaneka, Advocate with inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari 25, Annexure P-2, issued by the , as also the order dated 05.09.2025, Annexure P-10, whereby the petitioner’s candidature has been rejected on that basis. he impugned announcement requires that “the eligibility of the Reserved Category candidates of ming within the qualifying zone in UR/General has to be checked at par with the UR/General category candidates, before considering their candidature in UR/General certiorari , issued by the , whereby the of the candidates of ming within the qualifying zone in UR/General has to be checked at par with the UR/General category candidates, before considering their candidature in UR/General Aman Dua 2025.09.16 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-27538-2025 3. Learned counsel for the respondent/Commission submits that the Commission has announcement, dated like the petitioner who belong to other States otherwise, he irrespective of the order dated 4. In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and it stands disposed of 15.09.2025 Ad Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? 2025 -2- Learned counsel for the respondent/Commission submits that the Commission has decided announcement, dated 26.06.2025, applicable to reserved category candidates like the petitioner who belong to other States otherwise, he will be permitted to participate in the selection process irrespective of the order dated 05.09.2025. In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and it disposed of. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? Learned counsel for the respondent/Commission, on instructions, decided not to make the impugned to reserved category candidates like the petitioner who belong to other States. In case he is found eligible be permitted to participate in the selection process, In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and it TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No , on instructions, not to make the impugned to reserved category candidates found eligible , In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and it Aman Dua 2025.09.16 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document