IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 233 Jaspal Handa State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. factum of the petitioner having been imposed the punishment of stoppage of one increment not part of the charge 16.01.2024, Annexure P prays for re aforesaid submissions, in a time bound manner. 2. course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions authority which decided the review relook at the matter and note of the afore IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jaspal Handa Versus State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Brijesh Khosla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned Senior Counsel would submit that factum of the petitioner having been imposed the punishment of stoppage of one increment could not have been taken into consideration, as it was not part of the charge-sheet, while in the FIR, he vide judgment dated 16.01.2024, Annexure P-27, stands acquitted. In wake of the above, he re-consideration of the matter taking into consid aforesaid submissions, in a time bound manner. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions authority which decided the review would not be averse to hav relook at the matter and decide afresh by passing a speaking order, afore-submissions, after granting opportunity of hearing to the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26072-2023 (O & M) Date of decision: 31.07.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY . Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Advocate with Brijesh Khosla, Advocate, , AAG, Punjab. would submit that in the review, factum of the petitioner having been imposed the punishment of stoppage could not have been taken into consideration, as it was sheet, while in the FIR, he vide judgment dated 27, stands acquitted. In wake of the above, he consideration of the matter taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions, in a time bound manner. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the would not be averse to having a by passing a speaking order, taking after granting opportunity of hearing to the PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.02 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-26072-2023 -2- petitioner, within a period of 4 months, uninfluenced by the order dated 30.10.2023, Annexure P-20, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 3. The aforesaid satisfies the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner. 4. Disposed of accordingly. 31.07.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.02 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.