Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10137 (UTT)

NAYEEM AHMED v. TASEEN

WPMS/2417/2025 · 2025-08-19

Pankaj Purohit

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:7276 SL. No. Dat e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2417/2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Rajveer Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The prayer made in this writ petition is to direct the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) Haridwar, District Haridwar to decide the Original Suit No.295 of 2024, Fareed & others vs. Taseen, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Haridwar, District Haridwar within stipulated time. 3. Of-late, the Apex Court in the case of ‘Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi v. State of Maharashtra’ (Criminal Appeal No.4758 of 2024 decided on 25.11.2024 [2024 INSC 899]) has held that Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time-bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritizing the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending. 4. In view of the aforesaid legal authority, the Court finds that the present case does not fall within the category of ‘exceptional circumstances’. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in-limine. 6. Pending application if any, stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 19.08.2025 AK 2025:UHC:7276