DR JAI SINGH AND 6 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/14658/2025 · 2025-09-24
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14658 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:-
"(A)- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to Respondent Authorities i.e. Respondent No.1 to take decision as directed by this Hon'ble Court in the judgment and order dated 28.08.2023 passed in Writ Petition No. 13690 of 2023 within the time. (B)- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to Respondent Authorities to take decision as directed by this Hon'ble Court for taking Old Pension Scheme and also grant other retiral benefits as has been decided in the Case of Sarika Sircar by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. "
2. Sri Shivendu Ojha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri R. P. Tiwari, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri R. P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners as no Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajit Dwivedi, Shivendu Ojha, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dr Jai Singh And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And Another .....Respondent(s)
objection made by learned standing counsel. Petitioners are directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 The Director of Higher Education, U.P., Prayagaraj within 20 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of.
September 25, 2025 AKT WRIA No. 14658 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad