Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.2845 of 2025
Anuswaya Mohapatra
….
Petitioner Mr. S.R. Mohanty, Adv. -versus-
State of Odisha & Others
….
Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 21.03.2025
04.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. On the oral prayer made by the learned counsel
for the Petitioner, he is permitted to delete Opp. party
No.2 from the cause title in Court.
3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
4. Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition inter
alia with the following paper:
In the light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to admit the writ application and after hearing the parties be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to consider the case of the Petition for compassionate appointment and to appoint the Petitioner under the Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme;
And; be further pleased to pass any other
order(s)/direction(s) as this Hon’ble Court thinks fit and proper And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.
4.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that application enclosed to the additional affidavit under Annexure-5 to the Writ Petition seeking appointment under the provisions of Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme though is pending before Opp. Party No.3, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opp. Party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted application within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition directs Opposite Party No.3 to consider and dispose of the application so available in the Writ Petition under Annexure-5 in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order with due communication to the Petitioner.
The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Sangita