Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10135 (CAL)

RAJ SINGH CHOPRA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/587/2024 · 2025-08-07

Bibhas Ranjan De

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item No. 03 Ct 32 rup 07.08. 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CRR 587 of 2024 With CRAN 5 of 2025 Raj Singh Chopra Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Rajib Mullick, Ms. Sonia Mukherjee … for the petitioner. Mr. Anirban Pramanick. … for the O.P. No.2. 1. Both the learned counsel appearing on behalf of parties to this revisional application are present and file a joint application for compromise. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the parties that matter has been patched up between the parties on certain terms and conditions. 3. Both the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties have submitted that the proceeding in connection with C.S. Case No. 44191 of 2018 pending before Metropolitan Magistrate, 11th Court, Calcutta corresponding to Hare Street Police Station Case No. 53 dated 02.02.2017 under Sections 120B/ 467/ 468/ 420/ 406 of the Indian Penal Code is liable to be quashed. 4. I have gone through the joint compromise application signed by both the parties and I find no reason to stand in the way of compromise between the parties. 5. Regard being had to the above, the proceeding in connection with C.S. Case No. 44191 of 2018 pending before Metropolitan Magistrate, 11th Court, Calcutta stands quashed. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the revisional application along with connected applications stand disposed of. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertakings. 9. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.) 2