CR-6218-2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 224 Robin Dhir Ajay Kumar and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. tenant laying challenge to the order dated learned Rent Controller, Hoshiarpur, in Rent Petition bearing No. RP 2017 titled as ‘ by the petitioner under Order I Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for impleading as party was dismissed. 2. submits that Rent Petition bearing No. RP Rent Controller, vide judgment dated 3. aforesaid su 2022 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6218 Date of Decision: Robin Dhir Versus Ajay Kumar and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Narinder S. Lucky, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manpreet Kanda, Advocate for respondent No. 1. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition has been filed laying challenge to the order dated learned Rent Controller, Hoshiarpur, in Rent Petition bearing No. RP 2017 titled as ‘Ajay Kumar vs. Prince Dhir by the petitioner under Order I Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for impleading as party (respondent No. 2) in the aforesaid rent petition was dismissed. At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 submits that nothing survives in the present petition as, Rent Petition bearing No. RP-40-2017 has been dismissed by the learned Rent Controller, vide judgment dated 12.01.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6218-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.09.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Narinder S. Lucky, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manpreet Kanda, Advocate for respondent No. 1. revision petition has been filed by the petitioner- laying challenge to the order dated 28.10.2022, passed by the learned Rent Controller, Hoshiarpur, in Rent Petition bearing No. RP-40- Prince Dhir’, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order I Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC (respondent No. 2) in the aforesaid rent petition At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent No. 1- nothing survives in the present petition as, the aforesaid main 2017 has been dismissed by the learned 12.01.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the bmissions of learned counsel for the Respondent and submits 28.10.2022, passed by the tion filed by the petitioner under Order I Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC (respondent No. 2) in the aforesaid rent petition the aforesaid main 2017 has been dismissed by the learned Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the and submits RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.12 18:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-6218-2022 that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such. 4. 5. 12.09.2025 rishu 2022 (O&M) -2- that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.12 18:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.