Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10133 (CHH)

NITIN PANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1715/2023 · 2025-08-31

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:44479 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1715 of 2023 1 - Nitin Pandey S/o Shri M. L. Pandey Aged About 47 Years Assistant Professor History Government Dudhadhari Bajrang Girls Post Graduate College, Kalibadi Chouck, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary To The Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan Naya Raipur Police Station Rakhi Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Department Of Higher Education Block-3, Second And Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Additional Director Directorate Of Higher Education Block-3, Second, And Third Floor Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Principal Government Dudhadhari Bajrang Girls Post Graduate College, Kalibadi Chouck Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 5 - Dr. Mahendra Kumar Sarva Assistant Professor History Government Dudhadhari Bajrang Girls Post Graduate College, Kalibadi Chouck, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/09/2025 1. This petition is preferred against order dated 24.2.2023. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- "(1) to quash the order dated 24-02-2023 : ANNEX-P/1 (2) any other relief, which the Hon'ble Court considers proper under the circumstances of the case, may kindly be awarded.." 3. Vide order dated 31.3.2023, the petitioner was granted stay by this Court. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter and considering the fact that on the strength of the aforesaid stay order, the petitioner is still continuing at his original place of posting, as such, by the afflux of time the said orders, has lost its efficacy and as such the orders dated 24.2.2023 is required to be quashed and accordingly the said order under challenge is 3 hereby quashed. 5. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat