HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33958 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard Shri Tarun Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1 and Shri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Smt. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayers:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondent no. 1 to expeditiously decide the stay application and revision filed by the petitioner company bearing case no. 59 Appeal/77-4-2025 (M/s. Greater Noida Hostels and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority) within a stipulated period of time; ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondent no. 2 to keep the advertisement bearing Online Bidding Scheme Code INS-01/2025 in abeyance insofar as it relates to plot no. 206, Sector Knowledge Park-5, Greater Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar admeasuring 4080 sq. mtrs. till the pendency of revision before the respondent no. 1. iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS restraining the respondent no. 2 from initiating any allotment process with respect to the plot no. 206, Sector Knowledge Park-5, Greater Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar admeasuring 4080 sq. mtrs. till the pendency of revision before the respondent no. 1." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prakhar Saran Srivastava, Tarun Agrawal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. M/S. Greater Noida Hostela And Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd., .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) 3. It is argued that against the order dated 20.03.2023 passed by the respondent- authority, Revision as provided under Section 41(3) has been filed before the respondent no. 1 on 04.05.2023. In the said revision, a prayer was also made to grant an interim protection. 4. It is argued that interim protection is urgently required. Hence a prayer has been made to direct the Respondent No.1 to pass appropriate order on the application for the grant of interim relief, expeditiously and simultaneously decide entire revision also within the time bound period also. 5. It is argued by Shri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2 that a revision itself was also filed after more than two years. Hence, the petitioner is not entitled for the relief as prayed for. 6. On the other hand, assistant has been sought by Shri Kartikeya Saran, learned Additional Advocate General who is present in the Court on behalf of respondent no.1, who is the competent authority in the matter, it is very fairly argued by him that respondent no.1 will pass appropriate orders on the application for the grant of interim relief within a period of three weeks from today. 7. Heard counsel for the parties. 8. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of finally directing the Respondent No.1 to pass appropriate order on the application for the grant of interim relief filed in the said revision within a period of three weeks from today. 9. Needless to say that respondent no.1 will decide the entire revision also, expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months. 10. Shri Kartikeya Saran, learned Additional Advocate General will inform regarding this order to the Respondent No.1 forthwith. (Prakash Padia,J.) September 25, 2025 Swati WRIC No. 33958 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad