HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33202 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Shailesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pankaj Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 172 of 2025, under Sections 118(2), 351(2) of BNS, Police Station Mandawar, District Bijnor, during the pendency of trial. 4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have assaulted the informant and caused grievous injuries to his private part with an intention to severe it, who was subsequently taken to hospital and the injured person has sustained seven stitched wounds on his private part, as such he instituted the FIR. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. She has nothing to do with the said offence. 6. Learned counsel has next stated that the FIR is delayed by about 22 hours and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. The allegations as narrated in the FIR cannot be believed, as it was odd hour for the said act being committed. The doctor could not give any opinion about the gravity of the offence, as such the applicant, being a lady, is entitled for Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Shailesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Tanu Kumari .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) bail. 7. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 23.08.2025 and she is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail. 8. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Tanu Kumari, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during trial. ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 12. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 25, 2025 Sumit S BAIL No. 33202 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad