IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4518 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2024 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1. Rishikant Rawat @ Rishi Rawat Son of Mashudan Rawat village- Mangtadih (Lagma), Ps- Chakai, Dist- Jamui 2. Randhir Rawat son of Mashudan Rawat village- Mangtadih (Lagma), Ps- Chakai, Dist- Jamui 3. Dhiraj Rawat @ Dhirju Rawat @ Dhiraj Kumar Rawat Son of Mashudan Rawat village- Mangtadih (Lagma), Ps- Chakai, Dist- Jamui 4. Nakul Rawat @ Ankit Kumar Rawat @ Nanku Rawat Son of Guddan Rawat @ Gautam Rawat village- Mangtadih (Lagma), Ps- Chakai, Dist- Jamui 5. Sahul Kumar @ Sahul Rawat Son of Manoj Rawat village- Kakanchor, Ps- lakshmipur, Dist- jamui ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-02-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 74, 303(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 17.10.2024 at about 10 AM, all the accused persons named in the F.I.R., including these petitioners, in order to grab and take possession over land of informant were constructing wall and on protest, all of them assaulted informant and others and also Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4518 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 2/3 snatched gold chain and other articles. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of land dispute between the parties, maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners are simple in nature. Rest of the allegations are super-addition in order to make the case grievous. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4518 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamui in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 198 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T