C.SANKARALINGAM v. CHENNAIVAZH THIRUTHANGAL HINDU NADAR
OSA/309/2025 · 2025-09-24
Mohammed Shaffiq, S M Subramaniam
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101316 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101316 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
OSA No. 309 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ OSA No. 309 of 2025
1. C.Sankaralingam 2.T.A.Velmurugan 3.K.Senthil Chinnadurai Appellant(s) Vs
1. Chennaivazh Thiruthangal Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai Dharma Fund, Regn.No.114/1960 Represented By its Secretary Mr.D.Subbiah, Having Office At No.113, P.A.N.Rajarathinam Salai, Old Wadhermanpet, Chennai 21 Respondent(s) PRAYER To set aside the Common Order dated 26.08.2025 made in A.No.2392 of 2025 in CS.No.87 of 2024 on the file of this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA No. 309 of 2025 For Appellant(s): Mr.T.P.Prabakaran ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present Original Side Appeal has been instituted to assail the order dated 26.08.2025 passed in Application No.2392 of 2025 in CS.No.87 of 2024. 2. The appellants before this Court are the defendants in the Civil Suit. The suit has been instituted by the respondent herein for defamation and to pay damages. The consequential relief sought for is permanent injunction. The defendants moved an application before the learned Single Judge to remove the present managing committee of the respondent society and appoint an Administrator to manage the affairs of the respondent society pending disposal of the civil suit. 3. Learned Single Judge found that the relief sought for in the application is beyond the suit relief sought for in the plaint. That apart, the suit has been instituted for defamation and to pay damages, and in such circumstances, the defendants cannot file an application for appointment of an Administrator to run the administration of the respondent society. 4. We are in agreement with the learned Single Judge that the interim relief cannot be granted beyond the scope of the main relief sought for in the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA No. 309 of 2025 suit. That apart, the suit is for defamation and thus, the relief sought for in the application has been rightly rejected, and this Court does not find any infirmity in the order dated 26.08.2025 passed in Application No.2392 of 2025 in CS.No.87 of 2024. 5. Accordingly, the Original Side Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.
(S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J.) 24-09-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA No. 309 of 2025 To 1.Chennaivazh Thiruthangal Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai Dharma Fund, Regn.No.114/1960 Represented By Its Secretary Mr,D.Subbiah, Having Office At No.113, P.A.N.Rajarathinam Salai, Old Wadhermanpet, Chennai 21 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA No. 309 of 2025 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J. gd OSA No. 309 of 2025
24-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis