IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 140 Gurvinder Kaur Loveneesh CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) direction to the learned Rent Controller, Petition No.38 of 2024 (Annexure P “Gurvinder Kaur vs. Loveneesh Kumar”, in a time bound manner, which is pending since January 2024 and the respondent/tenant is lingering on the petition either one frivolous applications even without getting decide the application for leave to defend of the respondent. petitioner/landlord, who is under Sections 20 and 24 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 on 29.1.2024 for ejectment of the respondent/tenant from one property/shop No.6 in the name of ‘Mobile Hut’ No.347/12, Shergill Complex, Netaji Nagar, Civil Revision No.6554 of 2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6554 of 2025 Date of decision : Gurvinder Kaur Versus Loveneesh Kumar CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. A.P. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuing direction to the learned Rent Controller, Petition No.38 of 2024 (Annexure P-1) dated 29.1.2024 titled as “Gurvinder Kaur vs. Loveneesh Kumar”, in a time bound manner, which is pending since January 2024 and the respondent/tenant is lingering on the petition either one pretext or the other by filing frivolous applications even without getting decide the application for leave to defend of the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner/landlord, who is about 70 years of age, has filed the under Sections 20 and 24 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 on 29.1.2024 for ejectment of the respondent/tenant from one property/shop No.6 in the name of ‘Mobile Hut’ on ground floor, forming part of property No.347/12, Shergill Complex, Netaji Nagar, Civil Revision No.6554 of 2025 (O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ivil Revision No.6554 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-22.09.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA A.P. Kaushal, Advocate Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuing direction to the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana to decide the Rent 1) dated 29.1.2024 titled as “Gurvinder Kaur vs. Loveneesh Kumar”, in a time bound manner, which is pending since January 2024 and the respondent/tenant is pretext or the other by filing frivolous applications even without getting decide the application for Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the years of age, has filed the petition under Sections 20 and 24 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 on 29.1.2024 for ejectment of the respondent/tenant from one property/shop No.6 in on ground floor, forming part of property No.347/12, Shergill Complex, Netaji Nagar, Salem Tabri, Ludhiana, VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.24 09.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document on the grounds of non husband of the petitioner has died and now the petitioner requires the demise premises for her three children. Learned counsel submits that the arrears of rent is due s submits that after filing the Ejectment Petition, first the respondent/tenant avoided the service of summons and when the service upon respondent/tenant was effected, he filed an application to contest the Ejectm dated NIL P-4) to the said application (Annexure P the petitioner/landlord on 17.12.2024. After that respondent/te filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act (Annexure P-5) dated NIL, reply (Annexure P the petitioner on 03.4.2025. After that the respondent/tenant has filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint on 03.4.2025 (Annexure P which has also been filed by the petitioner/landlord on 08.5.2025 as Annexure P 22.7.2025 arguments on the app were not advanced, therefore the petitioner/landlord has filed written arguments on 12.8.2025 dated 17.9.2025 passed by a co 6542-2025, which was filed on the similar grounds as the present one. Learned counsel prays that the present petition be decided in the same Civil Revision No.6554 of 2025 (O & M) on the grounds of non-payment of rent and personal necessity as husband of the petitioner has died and now the petitioner requires the demise premises for her three children. Learned counsel submits that the arrears of rent is due since January 2015. Learned counsel further submits that after filing the Ejectment Petition, first the respondent/tenant avoided the service of summons and when the service upon respondent/tenant was effected, he filed an application to contest the Ejectment Petition and for leave to defend (Annexure P dated NIL, which, till date is pending adjudication. Reply (Annexure 4) to the said application (Annexure P- the petitioner/landlord on 17.12.2024. After that respondent/te filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act (Annexure dated NIL, reply (Annexure P-6) to which has also been filed by the petitioner on 03.4.2025. After that the respondent/tenant has filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint on 03.4.2025 (Annexure P which has also been filed by the petitioner/landlord on 08.5.2025 as Annexure P-8). Learned counsel submits that since 22.5.2025 to 22.7.2025 arguments on the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC were not advanced, therefore the petitioner/landlord has filed written arguments on 12.8.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to the decision dated 17.9.2025 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CR 2025, which was filed on the similar grounds as the present one. Learned counsel prays that the present petition be decided in the same Civil Revision No.6554 of 2025 (O & M) 2 payment of rent and personal necessity as husband of the petitioner has died and now the petitioner requires the demise premises for her three children. Learned counsel submits that ince January 2015. Learned counsel further submits that after filing the Ejectment Petition, first the respondent/tenant avoided the service of summons and when the service upon respondent/tenant was effected, he filed an application to ent Petition and for leave to defend (Annexure P-3) , which, till date is pending adjudication. Reply (Annexure -3) has already been filed by the petitioner/landlord on 17.12.2024. After that respondent/tenant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act (Annexure 6) to which has also been filed by the petitioner on 03.4.2025. After that the respondent/tenant has filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for rejection of the plaint on 03.4.2025 (Annexure P-7); reply to which has also been filed by the petitioner/landlord on 08.5.2025 as 8). Learned counsel submits that since 22.5.2025 to lication under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC were not advanced, therefore the petitioner/landlord has filed written Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to the decision ordinate Bench of this Court in CR- 2025, which was filed on the similar grounds as the present one. Learned counsel prays that the present petition be decided in the same VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.24 09.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document terms as in CR handed over in the Court, which is taken on r issuance of notice of motion is dispensed with at this stage, as it will cause further delay in disposal of the case. filed the ejec personal necessity as she requires the premises for her three children. Now, considering the fact that the ejectment petition has been filed on 29.1.2024 and since then the same including the applic mentioned above, are pending adjudication. canvassed by learned Counsel for the is disposed of Controller is directed to dispose of the pending period of three months from the date next fixed before the learned Rent Controller September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No Civil Revision No.6554 of 2025 (O & M) terms as in CR-6542-2025. Copy of the said order dated 17.9.2025 is handed over in the Court, which is taken on r Heard. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, issuance of notice of motion is dispensed with at this stage, as it will cause further delay in disposal of the case. The petitioner is about 70 years old widow and she has filed the ejectment petition on the grounds of non personal necessity as she requires the premises for her three children. Now, considering the fact that the ejectment petition has been filed on 29.1.2024 and since then the same including the applic mentioned above, are pending adjudication. Accordingly, keeping in view the above facts as canvassed by learned Counsel for the petitioner disposed of in terms of CR-6542-2025 and the learned Rent Controller is directed to dispose of the Ejectment Petition alongwith the pending application(s) moved by either of the parties period of three months from the date next fixed before the learned Controller. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. September 22, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No Civil Revision No.6554 of 2025 (O & M) 3 2025. Copy of the said order dated 17.9.2025 is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, issuance of notice of motion is dispensed with at this stage, as it will cause further delay in disposal of the case. The petitioner is about 70 years old widow and she has tment petition on the grounds of non-payment of rent and personal necessity as she requires the premises for her three children. Now, considering the fact that the ejectment petition has been filed on 29.1.2024 and since then the same including the application(s) mentioned above, are pending adjudication. Accordingly, keeping in view the above facts as petitioner/landlord, this petition 2025 and the learned Rent the Ejectment Petition alongwith either of the parties within a period of three months from the date next fixed before the learned Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.24 09.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document