2. On 09.12.2025, this Court had passed the following order: “Learned counsel contends that version and cross-version. The allegation agains petitioner is of having caused injuries on the forehead of the complainant with a danda while he himself also received 4 injuries as per the MLR No.67 of 2025, one of which was sharp. Co namely, Mohammad Suleman a since been granted interim anticipatory bail, vide order Annexure P-3. He is not involved in any other case; ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, DAG, Punjab, accepts notic State and Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate, appears this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel contends that it is a case of version. The allegation against the petitioner is of having caused injuries on the forehead of danda, which are simple in nature while he himself also received 4 injuries as per the MLR No.67 of 2025, one of which was sharp. Co-accused, namely, Mohammad Suleman and Sameer Mohd. have since been granted interim anticipatory bail, vide order 3. He is not involved in any other case; and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. otion. At the asking of the Court, Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, accepts notice on behalf of respondent- State and Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate, appears PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.17 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. on behalf of the complainant and made submissions in opposition. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 16.12.2025. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 22.12.2025.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Jaspal Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 09.12.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.17 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.