AMANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/10038/2025 · 2025-09-15
Jasjit Singh Bedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101274 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101274 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-10038-2025
Date of decision :15.09.2025 AMANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. A.S. Khosa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is the first marriage between the petitioners. The petitioners have prayed for the issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents for protecting their civil/personal rights and liberties from being invaded by the private respondents. The petitioners are alleged to have solemnized marriage on 08.09.2025 (Annexure P-3) on attaining the age of majority. They feel reasonable apprehension and a threat perception at the hands of the private respondents and pray that their personal/civil rights be not violated by them. Precisely, in the context of the aforesaid relief, the petitioners have approached the Sr. Superintendent of Police, District Sri Muktsar Sahib-respondent No.2 by way of a representation dated 09.09.2025 (Annexure P-5).
JITESH LAL 2025.09.15 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-10038-2025 -2- Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. At this stage, without expressing any opinion as to the validity of the marriage and majority of the petitioners, it would be just and appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to look into the grievance of the petitioners and pass an appropriate order on merits in accordance with law. Respondent No.2 would pass necessary order without being influenced by any pleadings made in the petition. It would be appreciated if the needful is done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this order shall not debar the official respondents from proceeding against any of the parties, if they are involved in any other case. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 15.09.2025 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2025.09.15 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document