IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 121 ANIL RAO STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER Present: Mr. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. AG Haryana 1. This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India in the nature of respondents to release all pensionary interest, which have been withheld despite withdrawal of punishment and dropping of charges vide order dated 25.11.2024 passed by the Government of Haryana (P respondent-Departmen (P-2) of the petitioner. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, an advance copy of the petition, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and 10.12.2024 (Annexure P in accordance with law within a period of of a certified copy of this order. The order so passed shall be furnished to the petitioner within one week thereafter. 4. P 5. It is, however, made clear to the respondent in case, the time frame, as stipulated above, is not adhered by the competent authority of the respondent for facing proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act. 16.09.2025 NainaRajput Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate for the Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. AG Haryana * * * * This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India in the nature of respondents to release all pensionary benefits of the petitioner along with interest, which have been withheld despite withdrawal of punishment and dropping of charges vide order dated 25.11.2024 passed by the Government of Haryana (P-1), with further prayer to direct the Department to decide the representation dated 10.12 2024 2) of the petitioner. Notice of motion. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. AG Haryana an advance copy of the petition, puts in appearance on behalf of the State and assures the Court that the representation dated (Annexure P-2) shall be decided by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of 04 of a certified copy of this order. The order so passed shall be furnished to the petitioner within one week thereafter. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. It is, however, made clear to the respondent in case, the time frame, as stipulated above, is not adhered by the competent authority of the respondent-department, he/she shall be liable for facing proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27550-2025 Date of Decision:16.09.2025 ….PETITIONER(S) ….RESPONDENT(S) for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. AG Haryana This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India in the nature of mandamus directing the benefits of the petitioner along with interest, which have been withheld despite withdrawal of punishment and dropping of charges vide order dated 25.11.2024 passed by the 1), with further prayer to direct the t to decide the representation dated 10.12 2024 Addl. AG Haryana, having served with an advance copy of the petition, puts in appearance on behalf of the s the Court that the representation dated ) shall be decided by passing a speaking order 04 weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The order so passed shall be furnished to etition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. It is, however, made clear to the respondent-department that in case, the time frame, as stipulated above, is not adhered by the department, he/she shall be liable for facing proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Date of Decision:16.09.2025 ….PETITIONER(S) ….RESPONDENT(S) This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the mandamus directing the benefits of the petitioner along with interest, which have been withheld despite withdrawal of punishment and dropping of charges vide order dated 25.11.2024 passed by the 1), with further prayer to direct the t to decide the representation dated 10.12 2024 having served with an advance copy of the petition, puts in appearance on behalf of the s the Court that the representation dated ) shall be decided by passing a speaking order weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The order so passed shall be furnished to department that in case, the time frame, as stipulated above, is not adhered by the department, he/she shall be liable (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) NAINA KATHIAT 2025.09.18 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document