Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101272 (ALL)

PIYUSH v. ABDUL SAMAD AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/35502/2025 · 2025-10-09

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35502 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed for the following relief: "i) Issue an order directing the learned Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (South) Kanpur Nagar to decide the M.A.C.P. No. 981/2019 Piyush vs. Abdul Samad and others within stipulated period granted by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed by the petitioner in the year 2019 and it is pending since then. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (South) Kanpur Nagar to decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after hearing all the concerned parties and giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment. October 10, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Kumar Sharma, Nand Kishor Mishra, Pawan Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Piyush .....Petitioner(s) Abdul Samad And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad