VISHWANATH S/O BHIMARAO SALUNKE AND ANR v. MANAGING DIRECTOR,
MFA/202536/2023 · 2025-03-17
C M Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10127 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10127 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1644 MFA No. 202536 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI
MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.202536/2023(MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1.
VISHWANATH S/O BHIMARAO SALUNKE, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
2.
NARMADABAI W/O VISHWANATH SALUNKE, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
BOTH ARE R/O GUNDAWAN, INDI TQ., NOW AT TIDAGUNDI, TQ. VIJAYAPURA-586 101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SANGANABASAVA B. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MANAGING DIRECTOR, VRL LOGISTICS LTD., REGISTERED AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, NH-4, BENGALURU ROAD, VARUR, HUBLI, DHARWAD DISTRICT-29.
SHIVALEELA DATTATRAYA UDAGI Digitally signed by SHIVALEELA DATTATRAYA UDAGI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Date: 2025.03.19 12:03:28 -0700
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1644 MFA No. 202536 of 2023
2.
THE MANAGER, UNITED INSURANCE CO. LTD., S.S. FRONT ROAD, VIJAYAPURA-586 101. …RESPONDENTS
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL NO.XV, VIJAYAPURA AT VIJAYAPURA IN M.V.C. NO.1129/2018 DATED 11.08.2021 SEEKING FOR ENHANCEMENT AND BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE CLAIM PETITION BY GRANTING THE RELIEF AS PRAYED FAR BY THE APPELLANTS HEREIN.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI)
The peremptory
order passed by this Court on 04.03.2025 is not complied.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that office objection No.4 is regarding production of the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1644 MFA No. 202536 of 2023
certified copy of the award and the same may be dispensed with since the digitally signed copy of the judgment is available on the District Court Web Portal. Even if office objection No.4 is over-ruled, the remaining office objections are not complied by the appellant. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (C.M. JOSHI) JUDGE
SBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15 CT: AK