Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101266 (MAD)

LAKSHMI RAVI v. The Commissioner of Police

WP Crl./872/2025 · 2025-09-17

N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 872 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR WP Crl. No. 872 of 2025 Lakshmi Ravi W/o. Rameshwar Ravi, No.10, Ex-Servicemen Enclave, Selaiyur, Chennai-600073, Tamil Nadu. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police Tambaram City, Medavakkam to Sholinganallur Road, Semmozhi Salai, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600119. Tamil Nadu. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, 1st Floor, Selaiyur Police Station, Palikkaranai District, Tamabaram City Police, Velachery Main Road, Selaiyur, Chennai-600073. Tamil Nadu. 1 / 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 872 of 2025 3.The Inspector of Police T-12, Selaiyur Police Station, Palikkaranai District, Tamabaram City Police, Velachery Main Road, Selaiyur, Chennai-600073. Tamil Nadu. 4.Singaravelan S/o. Late Nallathambi Padayachi, 38, Arivalayam Street, Madurapakkam, Ponmar Post, Chennai-600127. Tamil Nadu. Respondent(s) PRAYER This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the fourth respondent by preventing the fourth respondent from interfering in the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property in Survey No.61/3A2D measuring as extent of 43 cents in Madurapakkam Village, Tamabaram Taluk, Chengalpattu District. For Appellant(s): Mr.P.Sam Japa Singh For Respondent: Mr.R.Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate (crl.side) for R1 to R3 2 / 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 872 of 2025 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to restrain the fourth respondent from interfering with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the subject property and to provide police protection. 2. According to the petitioner, he had already obtained an exparte order against the fourth respondent. The fourth respondent, thereafter, had filed a petition seeking to condone the delay of 803 days in filing a petition to set aside the exparte decree and the same was allowed on payment of a cost of Rs.30,000/-. Since the fourth respondent failed to pay the said cost, the petition was dismissed. Aggrieved by the said order, the fourth respondent filed a Civil Revision Petition in CRP No.1470 of 2023, which is now pending before this Court, wherein an order of interim stay has also been granted. 3 / 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 872 of 2025 3. Considering the nature of the dispute pending between the parties, a blanket order cannot be granted at this stage. The petitioner is at liberty to adjudicate the issue in the pending proceedings, and depending on the outcome, he may renew his request for police protection. 17-09-2025 Neutral Citation:Yes/No mrp To 1.The Commissioner of Police Tambaram City, Medavakkam to Sholinganallur Road, Semmozhi Salai, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600119. Tamil Nadu. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police 1st Floor, Selaiyur Police Station, Palikkaranai District, Tamabaram City Police, Velachery Main Road, Selaiyur, Chennai-600073. Tamil Nadu. 3.The Inspector of Police T-12, Selaiyur Police Station, Palikkaranai District, Tamabaram City Police, Velachery Main Road, Selaiyur, Chennai-600073. Tamil Nadu. 4 / 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 872 of 2025 N.SATHISH KUMAR J. mrp WP Crl. No. 872 of 2025 17-09-2025 5 / 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis