Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101265 (PNJ)

SUGRIV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/10031/2025 · 2025-09-16

Surya Partap Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-10031 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 SUGRIV STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. directions to the respondent 2. the petitione P-5) before the present petition by issuing the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 3. 10031-2025 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH SUGRIV & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Mr. Balram Prashar, Advocate SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to respondents No.4 to 6. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioners have filed the representation dated ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for the present petition by issuing directions to the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10031-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 16.09.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. as been filed by the petitioners to protect their life and liberty from sel representing the petitioners submits that representation dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure earned counsel prays for disposing of irections to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. respondents No.1 to 3 only. (O&M) .2025 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from submits that (Annexure disposing of to decide GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.17 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10031 5. disposing of the representation the respondent No.2 and accordingly 6. hereby disposed of with a direction to representation within a period of 15 days from is further security to that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre perception to the petitioner petitioners make an independent and take a decision Gaurav Thakur Whether Whether reportable 10031-2025 (O&M) 8587 Learned counsel for the petitioner disposing of the representation of the petitioner respondent No.2 and that the instant writ petition be disposed of accordingly. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order further directed that the petitioners shall security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre perception to the petitioners or the validity of the relationship of the petitioners. The police authority of District independent assessment of the threat perception and take a decision on the issue of providing Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 rned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for of the petitioners (Annexure P-5) be given to the instant writ petition be disposed of Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) by passing a speaking order the date of receipt of copy of instant order shall be provided requisite safety and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre or the validity of the relationship of the . The police authority of District Ludhiana shall be at liberty to threat perception to the petitioner providing adequate security to them. :Yes/No : Yes/No submits that a direction for given to the instant writ petition be disposed of Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is decide the by passing a speaking order the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It safety and clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat or the validity of the relationship of the shall be at liberty to to the petitioners, GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.17 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document