Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101265 (MAD)

Murali v. State rep. by

CRL OP/25069/2025 · 2025-09-12

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 25069 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL OP No. 25069 of 2025 1. Murali S/o.Periyamuthuraj, Gurupatti, Santhanapalli, Krishnagiri. 2. Chinna Pulikhan S/o.Periyamuthuraj, No.6/285, Muthurayanagar, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Denkanikottai Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Crime No.297/2025. Respondent(s) PRAYER To grant Bail to the Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2 in Crime No.297 of 2025 pending on the file of the Respondent Police and thus render Justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25069 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): R.Radha Pandian For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.08.2025 for the alleged offence under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 109(1) of BNS Act @ 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 103(1) of BNS Act, on the file of respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity the petitioners and other accused persons abused and attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioners have been suffering incarceration from 08.08.2025. He also submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25069 of 2025 grant of bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that A2 is having 6 previous case pending against him, A3 and A4 are still absconding. He also submitted that the investigation is at preliminary level. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Taking note to the gravity of offence, the investigation is at initial stage, and on considering the bad antecedents, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 12-09-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rri https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25069 of 2025 To 1.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Denkanikottai Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Crime No.297/2025 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25069 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. rri CRL OP No. 25069 of 2025 12-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis