MADINENI SUBBAMMA, SPSR NELLORE DIST & ANOTHER v. PRL SECY, REVENUE DEPT (LA), HYD & 4 OTHERS
WP/4104/2016 · 2025-04-25
R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10126 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10126 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010114312016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 4104 of 2016 [3206]
Madineni Subbamma, Spsr Nellore Dist & Another and Others ...Petitioner(s) Vs. Prl Secy Revenue Dept La Hyd 4 Others and Others ...Respondent(s)
********** Advocate(s) for Petitioner(s):
G R SUDHAKAR, PALLE NAGESWAR RAO Advocate(s) for Respondent(s):
GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP), M S R CHANDRA MURTHY
CORAM : SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 2nd May 2025 P C : I.A.No.1 of 2017 This application is filed by the subsequent purchasers to implead themselves as respondents in the writ petition. Heard Sri M.S.R. Chandra Murthy, learned counsel appearing for the implead applicants and Sri G.R. Sudhakar, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and learned G.P. for Land Acquisition appearing for the official respondents. In view of the fact that the applicants had a registered deed of sale, it would be appropriate to implead them as party respondents in the writ petition, as their interest would be affected by any decision in the writ petition and further their presence is necessary for proper adjudication of the case.
Accordingly, this application is allowed and the petitioners in these applications are impleaded as respondents 6 and 7 in the main writ petitions. Registry to carry out necessary amendments. W.P.No.4104 of 2016 The writ petition along with W.P.No.4291 of 2016 are disposed of by a common order. (vide separate sheet)
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Js