THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATl WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO <^Fr.nNn APPEAL NO: 312 OF 2003 100 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Appeal under section the file of the Court of the II Addl.Dist. Judge East in O.S.No.661/1990 dt.10.7.2001 in A.S.No.58/97 on Godavari at Rajahmundry, Preffered against the Decree in file of the Court of the PrI. Dist. Munsif at Rajahmundry dt. 13.2.1999 in on the Between: Jujjavarapu Venkataratnam.. S/o. Subbarayudu, Gandhipuram-1. Rajahundry, E.G.Dist. ...appellant AND Life Insurance Corporation of India,, rep. by it's Divisional Manager, Jeevan Prakash Road, Visakhapatnam VDMC. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRI. G KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents:SRI. SINGAM SRINIVASA RAO The Court made the following:ORDER APHC010114582003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 312/2003 Between: I Jujjavarapu Venkataratnam ...APPELLANT AND Life Insurance Corporation Of India Counsel for the Appellant: 1.G KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1.SINGAM SRINIVASA RAO The Court made the following JUDGMENT: ...RESPONDENT 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 10.07.2001 passed in A.S.No.58 of 1997 on the file of learned II Additional District Judge’s Court, East Godavari Rajahmundry, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 13.02.1997 passed in O.S.No.661 of 1990 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif Court, Rajahmundry. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal has become infructuous as the cause does at 2. not survive. In response, learned counsel for the respondent reported no objection for dismissal of the appeal without costs. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the appellant and as the cause does not survive for adjudication, the Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 3. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The II AddI District Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry (with Records). 2. The PrI. District Munsif Rajahmundry (with Records) 3. One CC to SRI. G KRISHNA MURTHY, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI. SINGAM SRINIVASA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 6. Three CD Copies ns A HIGH COURT DATED;08/01/2025 ORDER ANOrt^ SA.No.312 of 2003 12 MAR 2025 Jx: I .. . Currsni Section THE S.A IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.