( 2025:JHHC:19459 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2933 of 2025 ------ Rohit Das @ Rohit Kumar Das, aged about 26 years, S/o-Gajo Mahra, @ Gaju Mahra @ Gajo Das, R/o village-Rangamatiya, P.O. + P.S.-Sarath, District-Deoghar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated- 16-07-2025 I.A. No.8525 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant bail application. Since, the hearing of instant bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2933 of 2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.10 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 319(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2)/61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B/66C/66D/84C of I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that only because one mobile phone along with two SIM Cards was recovered from the possession of the petitioner, hence, he has been implicated in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.01.2025 as is evident from para-22 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-03 of the supplementary affidavit. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security of Rs.66,900/- in connection with the transaction which has been made in his account from anonymous sources. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.66,900/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.10 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. In case, in any time during the pendency of the case the name of any victim comes out in connection with this case, the trial court may disburse the defrauded amount to the victim concerned from the cash security deposited by the petitioner. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/