HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3035 of 2025 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Mohd. Aslam Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Brijesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel, holding the brief of Mr. Narendra Kumar, learned counsel for private respondent nos. 8 to 14, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents. 2. The instant Public Interest Litigation has been filed for the following reliefs:- "(A). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to take appropriate action against respondents Nos.5 to 14 and it has also directed that Gata No. 1416/1910/1911 to be recorded as Navin parti of Village Ambheta Chand, Tehsil Rampur Maniharan, District Saharanpur. (B). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 08.07.20245 in accordance with law." 3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the private respondents have executed sale deed in respect to land which is recorded as naveen parti. He further placed the schedule prepared along with the order passed in the proceeding under Rule 109-A of the U.P. C.H. Rules in support of his argument. He further submitted that the petitioner has filed a complaint before the authorities for taking necessary action against the private respondents regarding execution of the sale deed in respect to plot no. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Aslam Khan, Mohd. Mateen Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushal Kishore Mani Subhash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 13 Others .....Respondent(s) 1911 which is recorded as naveen parti but no action has been taken till date, as such, necessary action be taken against the private respondents. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents submitted that the registered sale deed has been executed by the private respondents in respect to the plot which is recorded in their name. He further placed the sale deed which is annexed along with the instant P.I.L. in order to demonstrate that the sale deed has been executed in respect of their own plot rather the plot which is recorded as naveen parti. 5. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. The instant P.I.L. has been filed for taking appropriate action against the private respondents in respect to registered sale deed executed by the private respondents. 7.The registered sale deed executed by the private respondents has not been cancelled by any court of law, as such, no action can be taken against the private respondents for execution of registered sale deed. 8. The relief prayed for in the instant P.I.L. cannot be granted by this Court. 9. The P.I.L. is dismissed accordingly. October 9, 2025 C.Prakash WPIL No. 3035 of 2025 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad