SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT v. VARINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS
WP(C)/3674/2025 · 2025-12-27
Rajnesh Oswal, Shahzad Azeem
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10122 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10122 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 06 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 3674/2025
Sunil Kumar Sharma …. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:- Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate.
V/s
Varinder Kumar and Ors. …..Respondent(s)
Through:-
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE.
ORDER 27.12.2025
1. The grievance projected by the petitioner in this writ petition is that despite recording of his presence by the learned Tribunal in order dated 02.12.2025, bailable warrant has been issued against him.
2. After examining the record, we find that in the order dated 02.12.2025, presence of the petitioner has been recorded and, once the presence of the petitioner has been recorded in order dated 02.12.2025, the bailable warrants could not have been issued against him.
3. Accordingly, order dated 02.12.2025 to the extent of issuance of bailable warrants against the petitioner, is quashed.
4. The petition is allowed in the aforesaid manner.
(Shahzad Azeem) (Rajnesh Oswal) Judge Judge JAMMU 27.12.2025 NEHA-1
Neha Kumari 2025.12.27 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document