Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10677 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 776 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hiraman Shukla Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kalpnath Tripathi,Rajesh Shankar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,J. N. Maurya Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Rajesh Shankar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri J.N. Maurya, learned counsel for the respondent and learned Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner claims that his post retirement benefits as well as the arrears of salary have not been paid. A representation in this regard has been made but to no avail. The only prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the representation of the petitioner may be decided within a stipulated period of time. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the matter requires factual determination as per applicable law by the competent authority in the first instance. However, learned counsel for the respondent fairly contends that their claims for post retiral dues are liable to be decided by the competent authority within a reasonable time frame. In wake of the preceding discussion and without going into the merits of the case, the authority concerned is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner regarding his retiral dues along with the arrears of salary within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Vandit Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad