HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11801 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue a direction to Civil Judge (Junior Division) Shahar Jaunpur to decide the 6 C application dated 16.05.2022, which is pending in original Suit No. 772 of 2022 (Shailendra Kumar Versus Arundhati and others), within stipulate period fixed by this Hon'ble court. (Annexure No. 1 to this petition)." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Shahar Jaunpur to consider and decide the interim injunction application Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sakshi Patel, Shiv Naresh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shailendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Arundhati And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11801 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad