109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10013-2025 Date of decision: 16.09.2025 REKHA ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Iqbaldeep Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) 1. The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of private respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is widow of one Pawan Kumar and she is in possession of a house as per family settlement, but brother of deceased-Pawan Kumar and his family is interfering in her peaceful possession of the house, which she inherited from her deceased husband, namely, Pawan Kumar. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has moved a representation dated 03.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, but no action has been taken so far. 3. Notice of motion. MANISHA 2025.09.19 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10013-2025 -2- 4. Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepted notice on behalf of respondent-State and submitted that the competent authorities will take appropriate action on the representation (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law. 5. Heard. 6. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the matter and take action in accordance with law. (SUBHAS MEHLA) September 16, 2025 JUDGE manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2025.09.19 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document