Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101201 (ALL)

AYODHYA PRASAD AND 11 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/34106/2025 · 2025-09-24

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34106 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus/Commonding/ Directing the respondent No.2/-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, Distgrict Mirzapur to take the appropriate decision on the applications dated 13.6.2023 and 25.4.2025 of the petitioner which has been filed Under Section 24U.P.Revenue Code 2006 with regard to Bhumidhari Land bearing Arazi No.304 Rakba 0.4680 Hectare at Situated in Village Maheva, Tappa- 84, Pargana Kantit, Terhsil Sadar, District Mirzapur. (Annexure No.5 to this Writ petition) within stipulated period may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court during the pendeny of the writ petition." 2. It is contended that applications dated 13.6.2023 and 25.4.2025 filed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are pending consideration before respondent no.2- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Mirzapur. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is to expeditiously decide the aforesaid applications. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent no.2- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Mirzapur to decide the applications dated 13.6.2023 and 25.4.2025 filed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mithilesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ayodhya Prasad And 11 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 25, 2025 SK Goswami WRIC No. 34106 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad