IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 136 VEENA KUMARI STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Ms. Ms. Ridhi Bansal ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the of the petitioner dated 14.02.2024 (Annexure P speaking order (Annexure P competent authority served upon the petitioner that the respondents be directed to consider and decide the representation petitioner afresh 2. Issue notice to the respondents. 3. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana 4. Heard. 5. The petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-7) by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from now. 17.09.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27701-2025 DATE OF DECISION: VEENA KUMARI Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA . Sidhi Bansal, Advocate and Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the of the petitioner dated 14.02.2024 (Annexure P- (Annexure P-15). The order does not appear to be competent authority, as a matter of fact only a served upon the petitioner whereby case of the petitioner is rejected that the respondents be directed to consider and decide the representation afresh by passing a speaking order. Issue notice to the respondents. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard. The petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 14.02.2024 7) by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) (DEEPAK MANCHANDA Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 DATE OF DECISION: 17.09.2025 … Petitioner (s) ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL DEEPAK MANCHANDA , Advocate for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation -7) has been rejected by a non- does not appear to be passed by the a copy of the noting has been whereby case of the petitioner is rejected. She submits that the respondents be directed to consider and decide the representation of the At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional notice on behalf of the respondents. The petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.4 to of the petitioner dated 14.02.2024 7) by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No representation - passed by the copy of the noting has been submits of the At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional The petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.4 to of the petitioner dated 14.02.2024 7) by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.09.18 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document