CWP-26740 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (217) Bansi Lal State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. dated 09.03.2023 (Annexure P Section 22 (2) of the Act, 2007 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Act of 2007’), by the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Pathankot (respondent No.3). Even, the appeal preferred by the appellant/petitioner 09.03.2023 (Annexure P Magistrate-cum No.2), vide order dated 31.08.2023 (Annexur writ petition has been filed Constitution of India. 2. Court, that 740-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Vishal Munjal, Advocate and Ms. Bindu Bala, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) The petitioner, a senior citizen, fetching grievance from dated 09.03.2023 (Annexure P-3), wherethrough, Section 22 (2) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Act of 2007’), by the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Pathankot (respondent No.3). Even, appeal preferred by the appellant/petitioner 09.03.2023 (Annexure P-3), was also dismissed by the learned District cum-Appellant Maintenance Tribunal, Pathankot , vide order dated 31.08.2023 (Annexur writ petition has been filed before this Court, Constitution of India. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, apprises this that a Civil Suit between the parties 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26740-2023 Date of Decision : 15.09.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. Advocate and Ms. Bindu Bala, Advocate for respondent No.4. The petitioner, a senior citizen, fetching grievance from an order wherethrough, his application under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Act of 2007’), has been dismissed by the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Pathankot (respondent No.3). Even, appeal preferred by the appellant/petitioner, challenging the order dated 3), was also dismissed by the learned District Appellant Maintenance Tribunal, Pathankot (respondent , vide order dated 31.08.2023 (Annexure P-6), and therefore, the instant before this Court, under Articles 226/227 of the Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, apprises this t between the parties concerned, is pending before the order application under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen has been dismissed by the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Pathankot (respondent No.3). Even, , challenging the order dated 3), was also dismissed by the learned District (respondent , and therefore, the instant under Articles 226/227 of the Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, apprises this pending before the MANPREET SINGH 2025.09.17 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-26740 learned Civil Court, the same has also been recorded in the order dated 24.03.2025. The relevant is extracted hereinafter : 3. petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the instant petition, and therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the same. 4. withdrawn, being not pressed. September 1 Manpreet 740-2023 learned Civil Court, and a compromise has been effected between the the same has also been recorded in the order dated 24.03.2025. The relevant is extracted hereinafter :- “File put up today on an application for taki and permission to withdraw the present case. Defendant Ajay Kumar appeared in person and suffered a separate statement to the effect that he undertakes not to sell the property which he has got from his father Bansi Lal and also undertook to abide the terms and conditions of compromise dated 20.03.2025, copy of which is Annexure-A. Plaintiff Bansi Lal along with counsel also suffered a separate statement to the effect that he has heard the statement of his son i.e. defendant No.1 Ajay Kumar and also undertook to abide the terms and conditions of compromise dated 20.03.2025. As such, the present suit may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn. Heard. In view of the statement suffered by plaintiff along with his counsel, the present suit stands withdrawn. Parties shall remain bound by terms and conditions of compromise dated 20.03.2025 Annexure executed between them. File be consigned to the Judicial Record Room, Pathankot.” In view of the above compromise, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the instant petition, and therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the same. Consequently, the instant writ petition is , being not pressed. September 15, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 a compromise has been effected between them, and the same has also been recorded in the order dated 24.03.2025. The relevant is “File put up today on an application for taking up the file and permission to withdraw the present case. Defendant Ajay Kumar appeared in person and suffered a separate statement to the effect that he undertakes not to sell the property which he has got from his father Bansi Lal and abide the terms and conditions of compromise dated 20.03.2025, copy of which is A. Plaintiff Bansi Lal along with counsel also suffered a separate statement to the effect that he has heard the statement of his son i.e. defendant No.1 Ajay and also undertook to abide the terms and conditions of compromise dated 20.03.2025. As such, the present suit may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn. Heard. In view of the statement suffered by plaintiff along with his counsel, the present suit stands dismissed as . Parties shall remain bound by terms and conditions of compromise dated 20.03.2025 Annexure executed between them. File be consigned to the Judicial Record Room, Pathankot.” In view of the above compromise, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the instant petition, and therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the same. Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed as (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No , and the same has also been recorded in the order dated 24.03.2025. The relevant is ng up the file and permission to withdraw the present case. Defendant Ajay Kumar appeared in person and suffered a separate statement to the effect that he undertakes not to sell the property which he has got from his father Bansi Lal and abide the terms and conditions of compromise dated 20.03.2025, copy of which is A. Plaintiff Bansi Lal along with counsel also suffered a separate statement to the effect that he has heard the statement of his son i.e. defendant No.1 Ajay and also undertook to abide the terms and conditions of compromise dated 20.03.2025. As such, the Heard. In view of the statement suffered by plaintiff along dismissed as . Parties shall remain bound by terms and conditions of compromise dated 20.03.2025 Annexure-A executed between them. File be consigned to the Judicial the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the instant petition, and dismissed as MANPREET SINGH 2025.09.17 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment