IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.140 Baljeet Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kuljit DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit No.2-Deputy Commissioner 09.06.2025 (Annexure 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction on the representation passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to preferably within two months 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 16.09.2025 Prince Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, Advocate or the petitioner. (Through Video Conferencing) Kuljit Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit Commissioner, Sangrur to take a decisi xure P-3), submitted by the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. representation dated 09.06.2025 (Annexure P-3 passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27624-2025 Date of decision : 16.09.2025 .…. Petitioner ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI (Through Video Conferencing) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, she would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent to take a decision on the representation dated the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to respondent No.2 to take a decision 3), submitted by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2025.09.17 06:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document