Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101139 (PAT)

Alijan Miyan v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/22053/2018 · 2025-10-14

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22053 of 2018 ====================================================== Alijan Miyan Son of Late Sadali Miyan, Resident of Village- Sathi Bazaar, P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran. 3. The Additional Collector-cum-the Manager, Bettiah Raj, West Champaran. 4. The Anchaladhikari, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran. 5. Imadudullah, Son of Sheikh Sarfuddin, Resident of Village- Katahari, P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran. 6. Sandip Patel, Son of Sri Ramnaresh Patel, Resident of Village- Bahuarwa, P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran. 7. Lalbahadur Raut, Son of Late Ramprasan Raut, Resident of Village- Semari, P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran. 8. Mazahar Miyan, Son of Suleman Miyan, Resident of Village- Semari, P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 14-10-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos. 1 to 4 to restrain the respondent nos. 5 to 8 from going upon the land measuring about 5 katha 15 dhur Patna High Court CWJC No.22053 of 2018(2) dt.14-10-2025 2/2 under khata no. 4 khesara no. 1135 situated in village-Semari, within Anchal- Narkatiaganj, District- West Champaran, which is purchased land from the descendant of khatiyani raiyat, who had got the land through exchange from Bettiah Raj, and for any other relief, the petitioner is found entitled.” 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be taking steps in accordance with law as the Title Suit No. 76 of 1996 (Alijan Miyan vs. Md. Puliya and 21 Ors.) has been decided in his favour on 07th July, 2000 (Annexure-2) to the petition. 4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U