Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101138 (ALL)

NAMAN KHATRI @ NAMAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/37574/2025 · 2025-09-24

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37574 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA appearing for the State. 2. This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of entire criminal proceeding of Case No.788 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.677 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 465, 102-B IPC and Section 13 of Public Gambling Act, 1867, P.S. Kotwali Mathura, District Mathura, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Mathura against applicant herein. 3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order along with materials available on record, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicant submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramesh Chandra Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Naman Khatri @ Naman .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and apply for bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825). 7. However, it is made clear that till four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicant herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. September 25, 2025 Vivek Kr. NA528 No. 37574 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad