Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-4713-2025 [1] 108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-4713-2025 Date of decision: 26.09.2025 Rana Partap Singh ...Petitioner Versus Ajit Balaji Joshi and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Harpal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the respondents-State has submitted that vide speaking order dated 25.09.2025, following decision has been taken:-
“5. In view of the objections raised by the Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements) Punjab, Chandigarh, and in accordance with the orders dated 24.01.2025 passed by the Hon’ble High Court in the aforesaid writ petition, Shri Rana Pratap Singh, Block Development and Panchayat Officer (Retd.) is being paid the retirement benefits along with 6% interest. These orders are issued after pre-audit by the Department’s Deputy Controller (Finance and Accounts).”
2. A copy of the said speaking order along with its true translation has been handed over to this Court during the course of arguments which is PAWAN KUMAR 2025.09.26 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
COCP-4713-2025 [2] taken on record and marked as Mark “A” and a copy of the same has also been given to learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that the amount along with interest would be released within a period of one month from today.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the same, the present contempt petition be disposed of but respondents be bound by the statement made before this Court and liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the present contempt petition in case respondents backtrack from the said statement.
4. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of. Respondents would be bound by the statement made before this Court. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the present contempt petition in case the respondents backtrack from the said statement. 26.09.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.09.26 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document