KAUSHALYA DEVI W/O LATE BANNU RAM KOLI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3740/2025 · 2025-04-17
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10111 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10111 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:16400] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3740/2025 Kaushalya Devi W/o Late Bannu Ram Koli, R/o Tahla Road Rajgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Jaipur (Raj).
2. District Collector, Alwar (Raj).
3. Sub Divisional Officer, Rajgarh Distt. Alwar (Raj).
4. Chairman Nagar Palika, Rajgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj).
5. Tehsildar, Tehsil Rajgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj).
6. Assistant Engineer, Irrigation Department, Distt. Alwar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Harshita Sharma for Dr. Mahesh Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 17/04/2025
1. For redressal of the grievance for removal of encroachment from the public land, the petitioner approached the authorities by way of representation for taking needful action.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of passing of considerable time till date the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the authorities concerned by passing a reasoned and speaking order, therefore appropriate directions be issued to the authorities to decide the same expeditiously.
[2025:RJ-JP:16400] (2 of 2) [CW-3740/2025]
3. Considering the above, the instant writ petition stands
disposed of by issuing directions to the authorities concerned to decide the representation filed by the petitioner (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible strictly in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties.
3. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.
4. Before parting with the order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/5