M/S GHANSHYAM ART PRINTERS AND v. REGIONAL MANAGER RIICO LTD AND
CW/4778/2006 · 2025-03-28
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10110 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10110 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14413] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4778/2006
1. M/s Ghanshyam Art Printers, B-32, Tulsidas Ki Bagichi, Janta Colony, Jaipur, Rajasthan
2. Ram Ratan Bhardwaj S/o Sh. Sardari Lal Bhardwaj, Proprietor of M/s Ghanshyam Art Printers, aged 70 years, R/o B-32, Tulsidas Ki Bagichi, Janta Colony, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. Regional Manager, RIICO Ltd. Malviya Industrial Area Jaipur- 302017 (Raj.)
2. The Chairman, RIICO Ltd. Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur- 302001 (Raj.)
3. Chief Manager, Union Bank of India, Janta Store, Bapu Nagar Branch, Jaipur, Raj.
4. The Chairman, Union Ban of India, 239, Vidhan Sabha Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai, 400021
5. Mrs. Jaya Seth W/o Late Shree Sharad Seth (m/s Cannan & Canan Ltd.) Hostel Warden, Indian Institute for Rural Managerment, Agrawal Farm, Mansarovar, Jaipur 302020 Raj.
6. The Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Nehru Palace, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
7. Nisha Bhatia C/o Rajendra Bhatia, India Today Fashion F-55 (A), Malviya Industrial Area, Jaipur-302017 (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh for Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 28/03/2025 On last date, i.e., 24.03.2025, following order was passed:-
“This writ petition is directed against the
order dated 23.05.2006 passed by the Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur. Learned Senior Counsel for the respondents submits that on account of subsequent
[2025:RJ-JP:14413] (2 of 2) [CW-4778/2006] development, this writ petition is rendered infructuous. None for the petitioners even in second round. However, in the interest of justice, they are granted one more opportunity to rebut the aforesaid statement. List the matter on 28.03.2025 at top of the list as prayed.” Today also, none appears for the petitioners even in second round. In view thereof, this civil writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/197