IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 236 CWP-342-2023 Date of Decision: 17.07.2025 JITENDER KUMAR AND OTHERS ... Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. **** Present: Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Rishav Kamboj, Advocate for Dr. (Mr.) Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Seeking setting aside of the letter bearing Memo No.98348/ES-I dated 10.06.2022 (Annexure P-8), whereby a separate seniority list has been prepared after ignoring the seniority of the petitioners as per tentative seniority list dated 01.08.2020 (Annexure P-2); and impugned letter dated 01.12.2022 (Annexure P-9) whereby directions issued to send the proposal for promotion to the post of Sub Divisional Engineer (Electrical) in respect of the candidates mentioned in the impugned letter dated 10.06.2022 (Annexure P-8). RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.07.22 01:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order CWP-342-2023 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in question is covered by the judgment dated 03.05.2025 passed by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP-6760-2020 titled as ‘Mohd. Zafar Iqbal Khan and Others Versus State of Haryana and Others’. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid factual and legal position. Hence, without going any further into the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 03.05.2025 passed in CWP-6760-2020 titled as ‘Mohd. Zafar Iqbal Khan and Others Versus State of Haryana and Others’ (supra). (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JULY 17, 2025. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.07.22 01:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order