SHAKEEL AHMAD AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/37562/2025 · 2025-09-24
Dinesh Pathak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101090 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101090 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37562 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.for the State- respondents.
2. The applicants have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 BNSS assailing the order dated 2.9.2025, passed by the Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act, Muzaffarnagar, in SST no.89 of 2024 (State Vs. Shakeel Ahmad and others), whereby the discharge application moved on behalf of the present applicants has been rejected.
3. Learned AGA has raised a preliminary objection qua maintainability of instant application on the ground of the availability of an alternative remedy to file an appeal under Section 14-A of the S.C./S.T. Act.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants has not refuted the contention as raised by the learned AGA qua availability of the alternative remedy as mentioned above.
5. In this conspectus, as above, the instant application is dismissed on the ground of maintainability, to avail a remedy of an appeal under Section 14-A of the S.C./S.T. Act.
6. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the documents annexed with this application to the learned counsel for the applicants after retaining its photostat copy at the relevant place. September 25, 2025 vkg Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ruduvant Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Shakeel Ahmad And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad