Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10109 (UTT)

ANKIT ARORA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1633/2022 · 2025-07-07

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1633 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Vinay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, AGA with Ms. Sweta Dobhal, Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for respondent no.3 through video conferencing. 4. Instructions are taken on record. 5. Learned counsel for the State submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner-Ankit Arora on 28.09.2022. 6. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that he would advise petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in the appropriate proceedings before this Court. 7. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. 8. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings in this Court, if so advised. 9. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 07.07.2025 Ravi