HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU OWP No. 2592/2018 Hamida Begum .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through :- None v/s State & Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Assisting counsel to Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 28.10.2025 On 05.03.2025, it was observed by this Court that with the passage of time, the situation may have changed and in fact, the reliefs claimed in the instant writ petition may have rendered infructuous and, as such, learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to seek instructions as to whether the petitioner is interested in pursuing this writ petition or not. Today, when the case was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that either the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition any further or with the efflux of time, the matter has rendered infructuous. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution along with connected application(s), if any. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge JAMMU 28.10.2025 Manan Sr. No. 63 Manan Mahajan 2025.10.27 23:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document