Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101072 (ALL)

RAMASHANKAR AND 3 OTHERS v. AADITYA NARAYAN AND 21 OTHERS

A227/11818/2025 · 2025-09-24

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11818 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "i. To exercise it powers of superintendence as enshrined under Article 227 of the constitution of India to direct the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) 15, Allahabad to decide the Original Suit No. 917 of 2020 (Ramshankar and others Vs. Aaditya Narayan and others) within short and stipulated period of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice. ii. To direct the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) 15, Allahabad to decide 6C application filed in the Original Suit No. 917 of 2020 (Ramshankar and others Vs. Aaditya Narayan and others) within short and stipulated period of time as fixed by the Hon'ble Court. iii. To restrain the private Respondents No.2 to 17 from inferring in peaceful possession of the property in dispute during the pendency of the Original Suit No. 917 of 2020 (Ramshankar and others Vs. Aaditya Narayan and others) pending before the Court of Additional Civil judge (Junior Division) 15 Allahabad." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2020 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ilma Naz, Mohammad Irshad Khan, Mohammed Iftekhar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ramashankar And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Aaditya Narayan And 21 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) 15, Allahabad to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 25, 2025 S. Singh A227 No. 11818 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad