Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10107 (UTT)

KISHORE CHANDRA PANDEY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2046/2020 · 2025-06-11

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2046 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Devesh Upreti, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous for the reason that after investigation, charge sheet has been submitted against petitioner and on the said charge sheet the trial have also been concluded, whereby the petitioner was released on his executing a bond of good conduct of two years. 4. In view of statement made by counsel for the petitioner, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.06.2025 SK