Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10107 (RAJ)

PRIYANKA BAIRAGI D/O LATE BRAJ BHUSHAN SHARMA W/O PURUSHOTTAM BAIRAGI v. THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

CW/3621/2025 · 2025-03-19

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12330] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3621/2025 Priyanka Bairagi D/o Late Braj Bhushan Sharma W/o Purushottam Bairagi, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Purani Sabji Mandi, Ward No. 14, Satsai Ji Ka Mandir, Sheopur, Madhya Pradesh- 476337. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur, Through Its Managing Director Cum General Manager, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Executive Director (Administration) And Authorized Appellate Authority, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Chief Manager, Baran Depot, District Baran, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendar Neel Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 19/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of by giving directions to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 08.01.2024 sent by the petitioner in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024). 2. Heard. 3. This Court directs Respondent No. 2 to consider the abovesaid representation of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of 30 days from the date of passing of this order, [2025:RJ-JP:12330] (2 of 2) [CW-3621/2025] strictly in accordance with law, as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). 4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with abovesaid directions. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/125