Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10107 (CHH)

RESHAM VERMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/765/2019 · 2025-04-02

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15498 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 765 of 2019  Resham Verma S/o Shri Firaturam Verma Aged About 32 Years Occupation- Agriculturist, R/o Village- Sarva, Thana And Tahsil- Kasdol, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Commissioner Through Raipur Division, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Collector Through Balodabazar, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Through Kasdol, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 5. Smt. Aarti Verma, Sarpanch Through Gram Panchayat Sarva, R/o Village- Sarva, Thana And Tahsil- Kasdol, Civil And Revenue District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 6. Ved Prakash Sahu S/o Shri Siyaram Sahu R/o Village- Sarva, Thana And Tahsil- Kasdol, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 7. Tarachand Kashyap S/o Vishal Kashyap R/o Village- Sarva, Thana And Tahsil- Kasdol, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.04.02 17:14:09 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate For State/ Respondents No. 1 to 4 : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 02-04-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that by efflux of time, instant petition has become infructuous. 2) Considering the submission made hereinabove, instant writ petition stands dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya