Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101052 (ALL)

MANOJ AND 14 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/34947/2025 · 2025-10-12

Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34947 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Mahendra Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned counsel for U.P. State Industrial Corporation Ltd.. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer for a direction to respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 09.10.2024 (Annexure No.6) qua the compensation for the acquired land within stipulated period. 3. No useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending consideration. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue, the writ petition stands disposed of asking the authority concerned to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. October 13, 2025 RKP Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Pratap Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anuj Pratap Singh, C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Manoj And 14 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad