Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010067222025 2025:GAU-AS:5852 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/766/2025 RADO BUI S/O- LATE LORA BUI, VILLAGE BALISOR P.O. LIKABALI PS LIKABALI LOWER SIANG ARUANCHAL PRADESH VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P P ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : R L CHUTIA, MR B DEORI,MR. M SAIKIA,MR. B K GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 13-05-2025 Heard Mr. B.K. Gogoi, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. N. Das, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State respondent. Page No.# 2/2 2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 for granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely, Rado Bui in connection with Dhemaji P.S. Case No. 35/2025 under Sections 61(2)/316(2) of BNS, 2023, R/W Sections 14/15 of the Assam Game and Betting Act, 1970. 3. Case Diary received. Perused the same. 4. It is submitted by Mr. Gogoi, the learned counsel for the petitioner that after obtaining the order of interim pre-arrest bail on 01.04.2025, the present petitioner had already appeared before the I/O, cooperated in the investigation and his statement is also recorded u/s 183 of BNSS. Mr. Gogoi further submitted that the petitioner is still ready and willing to extend his cooperation in further investigation of the case, if the interim pre-arrest bail is hereby made absolute. 5. Ms. Das, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted in this regard that the accused/petitioner appeared before the I/O and cooperated in the investigation of the case and his statement is also recorded. However, there are some incriminating materials against the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by learned counsels for both sides, materials in the Case Diary and the conduct of the accused/petitioner, I find that custodial interrogation may not be necessary for further investigation of the case and accordingly I find it a fit case to extend the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the order of interim bail dated 01.04.2025 is hereby made absolute under the same terms and conditions. JUDGE Comparing Assistant