PANGI RANGA RAO @ RANGA BABU ALIAS KONDA BABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/2390/2025 · 2025-03-20
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10104 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10104 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
i Between: pangi Ranga Rao @ Ranga Babu Alias Konda Babu, S/o. Ramadasu, age about 28 Years, Polambanda Village, Kit'umula Post, Chinthapalli Mandal, Alluri Seetharama Raju District ...Petitioner/Accused-A7 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, H'lgh Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravati. ...Respondent/Complainant i= Petition under Sections 480 & 483 of BNSS and Old Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed ih support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner/ A7 on bail in Cr.No. 21/2023 uNne:I:rre::CitiO nN D2 :(sb ):i:( Bj'o.of10N4D:fS2:2Ct31o9n8:ieP:#i;odnd it:onEalc:sI.eStr:::t:Onn; A Sessions Judge, NeIIore. - The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the` J memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent;
APHCO10113532025 I, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2390/2025 Betwee n : Pangi Ranga Rao @ Ranga Babu ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AIias Konda Babu The State Of Andhra Pradesh AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following= ORDER.I- This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the BNSS, has been filed by the petitioner/A8, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.21 of 2023 of Nellore-I SEB Police Station, Nellore SEB. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner herein and others for the offences punishable under sections 8(c) r/w / __/ \=- Eral e±irsg6€
2 20(b)(ii)(B) of the N;ricotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short lthe NDPS A6t'). 3. The brief facts of the case are that on 14.04.2023 at about 2.30 p.m., on receipt of credible information about the illegal possession of ganja, the Enforcement Inspector of Police, along with his staff and mediators, rushed to vegetable shop (towards Ayyappagudi), Current Office Center, Nellore City noticed two persons who stood and having whl'te colour plastic bags in their hands. On suspicious, the Enforcement Inspector of Police with help of staff caught hold the two persons and on sear in that plastic bags and seized four kgs of ganja. 4.
Heard. Perused the record. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner/A7 was remanded to judicial custody upon the production of a P.T.Warrant and has been judicial custody since
03.01.2025. He further submits that, based on confessio'ns of co-accused, the case was registered against the petitioner/A7, and no contraband was seized from him. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has a permanent abode at Polambanda Village, Chinthapalli MandaI, E= -_.==_~==*
```` 3 Jy Alluri Seetharama Raju District, and there iS nO POSSibility of his fleeing away from the Jurisdiction of the Court. 6. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, while OPPOSing the prayer of the petitioner, submits that the investigation is not complete. when ascertained the learned Assistant Public prosecutor confirmed that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent. 7. ln view of the facts and Circumstances Of the Case, Since the petitioner herein is arrayed as accused No.7 basing on the confessional statement of co-accused and no contraband was seized from him, this court is of the opinion that the release of the present petitioner would not hinder the investigation in anyway. Most of the witnesses are Shown tO be Official witnesses and the release of the petitioner/A7 would not cause hampering of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner herein/A6, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner/A7 shall be released on executing a personal bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with one surety for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Sessions Judge for trial of the Cases under NDPS Act-Gum-I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nellore. /' pe±c-
4 (lu After relertyase, the petjtl'oner sha" appear before the statI'On House officer concerned, once in a fortnl'ght for a period of three (o3) months. (lil-) That the petI-tl-Oner I-S dl-rected not to hamper the 'nvestigatl'on and tamper with the prosecutl'on wI'tnesses and he shall cooperate wl'th the jnvestjgatjon. 8. AccordI'ngly, the Crl-ml-nat Petition I-s a"owed. SD/-B.CHITTI JOSEPH ISTRAR To, ``-` //TRUE COPY// For I A S :iS_TAN2gf SECTION OFFICER
1.
The Special sessions Judge for Trial of the cases under the NarcotI'C Drugs and psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Gum-I Addl'tional sessI'OnS Judge, Nellore, -spsR Nellore Dl'strict
2. The superintendent, central prison, Nellore, spsR Nellore D,'strl'ct +
3. The stall-on House officer, prohibitl'on & Excise station, Nellore-1 SEB, SPSR Nellore District
4. One cc to SRI. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU Advocate [opuc]
5. Two cos to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High coun of Andhra pradesh [OUT]
6. One spare copy PSR I -sI
f* HIGH COURT TMR,J DATED: 20/03/2025 BAIL ORDER . CRLPINo.2390 of 2025 ALLOWED