Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3849 CRL.A No. 200101 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.200101/2025 (U/S 14(A)) BETWEEN:
SACHIN S/O SHARANAPPA KIRASAVALAGI, AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O. RAM NAGAR, MASHAL NOW AT SAGANOOR VILLAGE, TQ. AFZALPUR, DIST. KALABURAGI-585328.
…APPELLANT (BY SRI S.B. SANGOLAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE, THROUGH DEVAL GANAGAPUR POLICE STATION, TQ. AFZALPUR, DIST. KALABURAGI, (REPRESENTING BY ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI-585105).
2. MALLANNA S/O BASANNA CHAKRA, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: LABOUR,
Digitally signed by SUMITRA SHERIGAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3849 CRL.A No. 200101 of 2025
R/O. SAGNOOR VILLAGE, TQ. AFZALPUR, DIST. KALABURAGI-585328. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP, FOR R1)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14-A(2) OF SC/ST (PA) ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 13-01-2025 IN SPL.CASE SC/ST NO.36/2024 REJECTING THE BAIL PETITION FILED BY THE APPELLANT UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNSS, 2023, AND BE PLEASED TO ENLARGE THE APPELLANT ON REGULAR BAIL IN CRIME NO.13/2024 OF DEVAL GANAGAPUR P.S., TQ.
AFZALPUR, DIST. KALABURAGI, PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPL. JUDGE, KALABURAGI, IN SPL.CASE SC/ST NO.36/2024 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 302, 109, 120(B), 212 R/W SECTION 149 OF IPC AND SECTION 3(1)(r), 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST P.A. ACT AND SECTIONS 25(IA) 27(3) INDIAN ARMS ACT, 1956.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA)
1. Case called twice. None present on behalf of the appellant.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3849 CRL.A No. 200101 of 2025
2. This Court passed an order for issue of notice to the second respondent on 01.04.2025. Till today, process fee and copy of the appeal memo are not filed for issue of notice to the second respondent.
3. Having regard to the nature of offence, unless the second respondent is served and heard in the matter, appeal cannot be disposed off on merits.
4. Noting the same, the following:
ORDER
Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(V. SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4 CT:PK